- From: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
- Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 23:15:46 -0800
- To: Brian Birtles <bbirtles@mozilla.com>, www-svg@w3.org
OK, thanks Brian! ~Daniel On 11/24/2013 04:55 PM, Brian Birtles wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > (2013/11/21 7:29), Daniel Holbert wrote: >> ... >> This is a contradiction. The attribute's default value, 0, flatly does >> not satisfy the "greater than 0" requirement. > > Yes, this is clearly a bug. > >> SO: presumably the spec wants to say "greater than *or equal to* 0", yes? >> >> The SMIL spec (which these all refer to as "the normative definition for >> this attribute") does say "greater than or equal to 0", FWIW: >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-smil-animation-20010904/#MinMax > > Yes, I notice that's also what we've implemented in Firefox. > > The plan is to move all those animation definitions into a separate spec > (currently called 'Animation Elements') so I'll make the fix there. > > Thanks! > > Brian >
Received on Monday, 25 November 2013 07:16:14 UTC