- From: Jelle Mulder <pjmulder@xs4all.nl>
- Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 11:35:24 +0800
- To: www-svg@w3.org
A thought on SVG glyphs,.. or alternative naming One of the things I was wondering about is the following. If I'm correct, text itself is not added to the DOM of a document. One of the complaints on SVG is that since every object has a DOM representation this eats memory, things bog down a lot. The obvious way to address this to my thinking is the use of SVG fonts, which could be any arbitrary object and then used without more than one DOM representation. Sure,.. still eats memory, but it will be fairly easy to handle. Now wouldn't it be the ultimate idea to use this way back method to create backgrounds for games, objects moving along paths and even create page layouts by using the mechanisms already defined in text placement and the substitution of fonts with other objects? Maybe to address sensitivities on this topic we could give it another name, such as GlyphSymbols, but it may just be the method to speed things up a bit. And give those that actually would like to use fonts in SVG format a method to use them. Nicely backwards compatible, animated et all, with flow text mechanisms actually quite useful for your multi device layouts and everybody is happy. It would even prevent us from having the conversation on why this wasn't done years ago. Or am I missing something here? Cheers, Jelle Mulder
Received on Saturday, 9 November 2013 03:30:49 UTC