- From: Henrik Andersson <henke@henke37.cjb.net>
- Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 21:43:44 +0200
- To: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
- CC: robert@ocallahan.org, Jeremie Patonnier <jeremie.patonnier@gmail.com>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>, David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Rik Cabanier skriver: > > It would not. > An 'inverse' mask would invert the pixels of the mask itself, not the > content that you mask. > > Maybe you're thinking of putting the text in the mask. If so, yes, that > would make it invert but: > - you'd lose the semantics since the text comes from a style. This loses > accessibility and copy/paste behavior > - you would have to put the text in another fragment or document > - you would have to define a way to link to HTML content from a mask. > This would be very hard to get consensus on. I thought there was an option to use the first result of a normal selector as the masking content.
Received on Thursday, 23 May 2013 19:44:23 UTC