- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 17:27:00 +1100
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>, SVG public list <www-svg@w3.org>
We spoke a bit about marker-pattern in the telcon today (before the power outage interrupted us). Nobody expressed any concerns about being able to write multiple tracks, so I think we have agreement on adding that. We didn't come up with any new syntactic solutions for specifying offsets and delimiting the marker pattern from them, so we can continue trying to work that out here. One thing that Dirk pointed out was that my idea of an offset was different from his. Dirk imagined that the offset behaved like stroke-dashoffset, i.e. it allows you to specify an initial non-zero position within the repeated path. I was thinking of it as modifying the length and position of the path that gets a marker pattern applied to it. If we wrote (assuming the syntax where the offset is before the pattern): marker-pattern: 10px url() 20px; then you would get a marker pattern like (each character is 5px wide): --X---X---X---X---X with both interpretations of "offset". It would make a difference though if you had, say: marker-pattern: 50% url() 50%; The former interpretation would result in: X-------X-------X and the latter in either: --------X-------X or --------X---X---X depending on whether the percentage in the pattern resolves against the path length before or after adjusting for the offset. My feeling is that these two meanings of offset cater to different use cases: * the former interpretation is for sliding the marker pattern so that it looks nicer at the start of the path * the latter interpretation is for ensuring that the marker pattern isn't painted at the start/end vertices of the path (since they might otherwise collide with other markers or graphics there) The idea of an offset at the end of the path obviously only makes sense with the second interpretation. IMO both are useful and we should try to accommodate them both in the syntax. I have no concrete suggestions for doing that yet.
Received on Friday, 30 November 2012 06:28:35 UTC