- From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 02:23:48 -0700
- To: Takuki Kamiya <tkamiya@us.fujitsu.com>
- Cc: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, "www-svg@w3.org" <www-svg@w3.org>, "member-exi-wg@w3.org" <member-exi-wg@w3.org>
Hi Takuki, On May 9, 2012, at 12:09 , Takuki Kamiya wrote: > Once such a shim API is in place for verbose XML path syntax, EXI will fit > squarely to serve as an content-coding for SVG file exchanges. It may prove useful if the EXI WG were to suggest a specific syntax for this, or at least guidelines as to what would achieve the best compression — which the SVG WG would likely balance against ease-of-authoring needs. Note that it should be easy to prototype this functionality using JS to show that it is usable. It's been done before (but I can't seem to find the code — it's old :). > From EXI WG's point of view, we would like to make EXI work to its fullest > to best serve SVG documents. One significant ingredient to achieve that is the > use of XML Schemas. EXI uses XML Schemas not for validation, but for > informing the processors of the most likely structure/datatypes of the > documents. We are aware that SVG is using Relax NG for defining its syntax. > We would like to explore the idea of having a parallel normative XML Schema > that is not for defining SVG syntax but for informing EXI processors of what > it can expect more likely than others gramatically. We would like to have this > discussed together with SVG WG. Is this something that we can work together > on among other aspects? Conversion from RNG to XSD ought to be possible in this case, but my concern would be the work involved in maintaining the two. I wonder if it would be possible to generate both based on some simplified syntax. A number of SVG's content models cannot be adequately captured by XSD, but I guess that those can for the most part be automatically simplified. > Since the EXI WG is going to meet during TPAC this year, we thought it a > great chance for the two WGs to get acquiainted and discuss the issue > face-to-face, depending on the schedule of the two WGs. If there's a chance that I could be looped into that meeting, I'd love to be there (crazy TPAC schedule permitting). -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Thursday, 10 May 2012 09:24:19 UTC