- From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 07:38:22 -0700
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- CC: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, SVG public list <www-svg@w3.org>
On Mar 15, 2012, at 6:00 AM, Chris Lilley wrote: > On Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 7:01:02 AM, Dirk wrote: > > (Cameron wrote) > DS> In 7. The SVG 'transform' attribute: > > DS> This specification will also introduce the new presentation > DS> attributes ‘transform-origin’, ‘perspective’, ‘perspective-origin’, > DS> ‘transform-style’ and ‘backface-visibility’ in the SVG namespace. All > DS> new introduced presentation attributes are animateable. > > DS> These attributes are not in the SVG namespace; rather they're in no > DS> namespace (or in the "null" namespace, not sure what's the preferred > DS> terminology). I think you can just drop "in the SVG namespace". > > DS> Can you point me to the section in the SVG specification? > > This comes from XML (actually, Namespace in XML), not from SVG. > > DS> In general SVG attributes should be in the SVG namespace, no? > > No. > > "A default namespace declaration applies to all unprefixed element names within its scope. Default namespace declarations do not apply directly to attribute names; the interpretation of unprefixed attributes is determined by the element on which they appear. " > http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-names/#defaulting > > > DS> The > DS> question is if presentation attributes do belong to the SVG namespace. > > No, because they are not prefixed. Thank you very much for the clarification. I removed the mention of the SVG namespace for attributes in the last editor's draft. Greetings, Dirk > > > -- > Chris Lilley Technical Director, Interaction Domain > W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead > Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG > Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups >
Received on Thursday, 15 March 2012 14:39:04 UTC