- From: Brian Birtles <birtles@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 17:17:28 +0900
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- CC: www-svg@w3.org
(2012/07/31 16:38), Cameron McCormack wrote: > Looks great! I can't remember if we discussed the mask property > referencing paint server elements previously, but I like how that is > handled. Thanks Cameron! We didn't discuss that, I just snuck that in. ;) I think it would be good if the mask property can take a CSS <image> value. It was with that in mind that I thought we should define some behaviour if you point it at a paint server element. > I think the <ul> in 14.4.2.3 should have an extra item to > mention paint server referencing explicitly. Good idea! Done. Thanks again! Brian
Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2012 08:18:11 UTC