On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Brian Birtles <bbirtles@mozilla.com>wrote: > Having thought about this a little more (and having been persuaded by > others), I think we can probably get away with the syntax divide. > Ultimately the rule might look something like "animations applied through > the style system sit on top of those applied directly to the elements." > That would still allow a lot of the future situations I have in mind (e.g. > CSS animations adding to SVG, SVG animations being applied through CSS > etc.) Even if we were to phrase it as "CSS beats SVG" we could make it more > generic later. > > Also, even with such a rule, I've been persuaded that it will still be > possible to add more fine-grained control later so that we could have, for > example, an SVG animation adding on top of a CSS one. > By "on top of" to you mean "has priority over"? The former expression is vague, so please clarify.
Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2012 08:30:59 UTC