- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 09:34:21 +1100
- To: www-svg@w3.org, public-svg-wg@w3.org
Here is the IRC log from our brief telcon before the power outage last week. http://www.w3.org/2012/11/29-svg-irc IRC log of svg on 2012-11-29 Timestamps are in UTC. 20:59:30 [RRSAgent] RRSAgent has joined #svg 20:59:30 [RRSAgent] logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/11/29-svg-irc 20:59:32 [trackbot] RRSAgent, make logs public 20:59:32 [Zakim] Zakim has joined #svg 20:59:34 [trackbot] Zakim, this will be GA_SVGWG 20:59:34 [Zakim] ok, trackbot, I see GA_SVGWG(SVG1)4:00PM already started 20:59:35 [trackbot] Meeting: SVG Working Group Teleconference 20:59:35 [trackbot] Date: 29 November 2012 20:59:50 [krit] zakim, who is on the phone 20:59:51 [Zakim] I don't understand 'who is on the phone', krit 20:59:56 [krit] zakim, who is on the phone? 20:59:56 [Zakim] On the phone I see +2aaaa 21:00:01 [Zakim] +[IPcaller] 21:00:02 [Zakim] + +61.2.980.5.aabb 21:00:04 [krit] zakim, 2aaaa is me 21:00:04 [Zakim] sorry, krit, I do not recognize a party named '2aaaa' 21:00:09 [nikos] Zakim, +61.2 is me 21:00:09 [Zakim] +nikos; got it 21:00:17 [krit] zakim, aaaa is me 21:00:17 [Zakim] +krit; got it 21:00:23 [Zakim] +[IPcaller.a] 21:00:25 [heycam] Zakim, [ is me 21:00:25 [Zakim] sorry, heycam, I do not recognize a party named '[' 21:00:29 [heycam] Zakim, [I is me 21:00:29 [Zakim] sorry, heycam, I do not recognize a party named '[I' 21:00:33 [heycam] Zakim, [IPcaller.a] is me 21:00:33 [Zakim] +heycam; got it 21:00:37 [birtles] Zakim, IPcaller is me 21:00:37 [Zakim] +birtles; got it 21:00:37 [nikos] zakim, who is noisy? 21:00:50 [Zakim] nikos, listening for 10 seconds I could not identify any sounds 21:00:58 [heycam] Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2012OctDec/0044.html 21:01:02 [heycam] Chair: Cameron 21:01:02 [krit] zakim, 2aaaa is me 21:01:02 [Zakim] sorry, krit, I do not recognize a party named '2aaaa' 21:01:06 [Zakim] -nikos 21:01:11 [krit] zakim, who is noisy? 21:01:16 [Zakim] +[IPcaller] 21:01:17 [Zakim] +nikos 21:01:24 [Zakim] krit, listening for 11 seconds I heard sound from the following: birtles (32%), heycam (8%) 21:01:35 [ed] Zakim, [IP is me 21:01:35 [Zakim] +ed; got it 21:02:29 [Zakim] +Doug_Schepers 21:02:34 [Zakim] +cabanier 21:04:24 [cabanier] scribenick: cabanier 21:04:37 [cabanier] topic: Sydney F2F 21:04:59 [cabanier] heycam: CSS WG has their meeting at Tucson at the same time 21:05:14 [cabanier] … but it's not really feasible to change for us 21:05:29 [cabanier] … so we're not chaning our meeting 21:06:18 [cabanier] krit: our tickets are being approved 21:06:33 [cabanier] krit: so it's hard to move 21:07:02 [cabanier] heycam: chris won't come and we would miss Tab 21:07:18 [cabanier] topic: marker discussion 21:07:48 [cabanier] heycam: we've had an email discussion about the marker property 21:08:15 [Zakim] + +33.9.53.77.aacc 21:08:20 [cabanier] … marker segment was my proposal for marker pattern 21:08:49 [Tav] zakim, aacc is me 21:08:49 [Zakim] +Tav; got it 21:08:52 [cabanier] … in the spec I added marker pattern and marker segment 21:09:29 [cabanier] … in the thread Dirk was wondering if we could add functionality from marker segment to marker patterns 21:09:39 [cabanier] … so we wouldn't need separate properties 21:10:01 [cabanier] Tav: marker segment seems like an obvious thing 21:10:11 [cabanier] heycam: that was my concern as well 21:10:32 [cabanier] krit: you may want to position marker on the segment itself 21:10:53 [cabanier] … you may want to position it on the begin/ end instead of the middle 21:11:29 [cabanier] heycam: were you think of the automatic 21:11:47 [cabanier] krit: I would like to position a marker along a path 21:12:50 [cabanier] heycam: why doesn't marker-mid work for that 21:13:03 [cabanier] krit: you'd have to draw into different segments 21:13:27 [cabanier] heycam: no, it draws for every vertex except the first and last 21:14:07 [cabanier] krit: maybe I misunderstood 21:14:30 [cabanier] krit: o yes. I does what I want 21:15:14 [heycam] ---x-x--- 21:15:21 [cabanier] heycam: one example I though 21:15:30 [cabanier] … you have 2 markers on a segment 21:15:58 [cabanier] … I think that kind of pattern has been seen before 21:16:05 [cabanier] … so it would be good to be able to do that 21:16:44 [richardschwerdtfeger] richardschwerdtfeger has joined #svg 21:17:07 [cabanier] heycam: the main diffferences between me and Tab, was to repeat the marker pattern over each segment 21:17:24 [cabanier] … and that you could specify an offset that the pattern isn't repeated into 21:17:37 [cabanier] … so you'd have 20pixel of offset 21:18:04 [cabanier] nikos: so you can have a comma separated list of marker pattern 21:18:08 [cabanier] heycam: yes 21:18:09 [heycam] marker-pattern: url() 20px, url() 40px 21:18:38 [cabanier] heycam: a marker every 20 px and one every 40px 21:18:51 [cabanier] … the discussion was about the best syntax 21:19:07 [cabanier] cabanier: so the marker would overlap each other 21:19:13 [cabanier] heycam: yes 21:19:21 [cabanier] cabanier: and there is a drawing order 21:19:24 [cabanier] heycam: yes 21:19:32 [cabanier] nikos: what does the offset do 21:20:02 [cabanier] heycam: it shortens the path between both ends 21:20:14 [cabanier] … and the pattern only shows between them 21:20:57 [cabanier] krit: the offset is the thing that cuts of the markers at the beginngin and end of the path 21:21:12 [cabanier] heycam: no, it shifts where the patterns starts and end 21:22:41 [cabanier] krit: do we want to support multiple tracks? 21:22:42 [Zakim] +Rich 21:22:49 [cabanier] heycam: yes 21:22:59 [cabanier] nikos: multiple tracks is cool. 21:23:11 [cabanier] … and use percentages 21:23:19 [cabanier] heycam: I think it should be 21:24:52 [krit] ----X 21:24:58 [krit] X is on 100% 21:25:11 [krit] offset is 20% 21:25:16 [krit] X---- 21:26:10 [cabanier] heycam: my feeling is that the offset is at 20%, there shouldn't be any markers at the beginning 21:26:18 [cabanier] krit: that is not the definition of offset 21:26:25 [cabanier] heycam: it is if we define it that way 21:27:43 [cabanier] krit/heycam discussing... 21:30:01 [cabanier] heycam: maybe offset was the wrong word to use 21:30:11 [cabanier] … because it looks like dash offset 21:30:41 [cabanier] … it sounds that people like multiple tracks 21:30:47 [cabanier] tav: what does that mean 21:31:00 [cabanier] heycam: you have a comma separated list and apply each one on a path 21:31:58 [cabanier] krit: it would mean less interaction with the DOM 21:32:32 [cabanier] heycam: hopefully at one point CSSOM has easy access to multiple border/backgrounds 21:32:43 [cabanier] krit: it seems that we're replacing vector effects 21:32:52 [cabanier] heycam: I think that's true 21:33:13 [cabanier] … some of the use case for vector effects, it would be good to have a different solution 21:33:20 [cabanier] … we can solve that later 21:33:56 [cabanier] … we can discuss this further on the mailing list 21:34:06 [cabanier] krit: I would like to resolve it
Received on Thursday, 6 December 2012 22:34:55 UTC