- From: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:08:45 -0700
- To: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
- Cc: "www-svg@w3.org" <www-svg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAGN7qDBoS=+Z97kQDfW_tkH-=29EpxS8T-2hPPeWXNOXqe7GdA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com> wrote: > Some issues regarding the added 'fr' attribute on radialGradient: > > a) Should 'fr' be allowed to be negative? (this is disallowed in > <canvas>). What should happen if it is? > yes, that should not be allowed. > b) Should we still keep the constraint[1] to move the focal point inside > the other circle? <canvas> doesn't do this. What the spec currently defines > means some kinds of conical gradients aren't possible to do with > <radialGradient>. > No. let's remove it. > c) Related to b): the case where the focal point is outside the other > circle, but the focal radius makes the two circles intersect, how should > that be handled? > The gradient will render as a cone. Repeat/reflect might display a bit strange, but that's probably OK > > Proposal: > a) disallow negative values for 'fr', and let these cases fallback to the > lacuna value '0%'. > b) remove the constraint and handle it the same as in <canvas>, noting > that this may break some existing content. If we do this way it doesn't > matter how the two circles are positioned relative to one another, so it > addresses c) as well. > agreed > > > [1] https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/**pservers.html#**RadialGradientNotes<https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/pservers.html#RadialGradientNotes> > -- > Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software > Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group > Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed > >
Received on Wednesday, 29 August 2012 21:09:15 UTC