- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:03:52 +0200
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Cc: SVG public list <www-svg@w3.org>
* Cameron McCormack wrote: >Do we need to keep this interface, which has the getSVGDocument() method >on it, and which was intended to be implemented on interface like >HTMLObjectElement? It's entirely redundant with contentDocument. >Unless people think content is using it, we should drop it. Well, it was added because there was no adequately defined and implemen- ted alternative available at the time, and making the current version of http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de/ I ended up using an <iframe> and `.content- Window.document` because none of the other alternatives I tried worked. If some implementations drop it because it's been dropped from the spec, that would be yet another case to consider when working around bugs, so I think there should be some evidence presented that `.contentDocument` is actually always available where needed or convenient these days. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Tuesday, 21 August 2012 11:04:37 UTC