- From: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:27:22 +0200
- To: www-svg@w3.org
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 06:54:09 +0200, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: > Do we need to keep this interface, which has the getSVGDocument() method > on it, and which was intended to be implemented on interface like > HTMLObjectElement? It's entirely redundant with contentDocument. Unless > people think content is using it, we should drop it. http://stackoverflow.com/search?q=getSVGDocument hints that there is some usage, but the interface is marked as being deprecated in SVG 1.1 Second Edition [1]. I think in particular for embed elements there were browser inconsistencies with contentDocument (in the past at least) that may have pushed people towards using getSVGDocument. Anyway, I think we should remove getSVGDocument from SVG2. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/struct.html#InterfaceGetSVGDocument -- Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Tuesday, 21 August 2012 07:28:01 UTC