- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 18:08:57 +0200
- To: "Erik Dahlstrom" <ed@opera.com>
- CC: www-svg@w3.org
On Tuesday, September 27, 2011, 4:59:07 PM, Erik wrote: ED> On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 22:22:04 +0200, David Dailey ED> <ddailey@zoominternet.net> wrote: >> Values above 1.0 should, as Opera does, oversaturate the image. Values >> under >> 0 should reflect the chroma (but not the luminance? If I see what is >> going >> on here). I agree that being able to increase as well as decrease saturation is desirable and common behaviour. The restriction to 0..1.0 should be lifted in SVG2 (and perhaps, errata'ed in SVG 1.1?) >> Maybe something little and easy to consider for 2.0? A single valued >> parameter that does the work of a whole matrix seems like an improvement >> for >> authors. Yes, some syntactic sugar would be easy there. ED> What Opera does is to use the equations already in the spec for computing ED> the matrix, they are defined for values outside the 0..1 range too. Yes, since the equations cover those values its easy to simply lift the 0..1 restriction - certainly in SVG2. -- Chris Lilley Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups
Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2011 16:11:06 UTC