- From: Rick <graham.rick@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 14:35:30 -0400
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Cc: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 21 October 2011 18:36:07 UTC
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: > As part of improving the SVG DOM, I think we should consider renaming > SVGPathSegList to SVGPath (or perhaps even just Path). SVGPathSegList is > unwieldy if we want to add a constructor to the interface so that authors > can do > > var p = new SVGPath("M100,100 ..."); > > Does anyone think there would be any compatibility risk with this? > > Don't you mean SVGPathElement? If you dropped the SVG prefix, all SVG objects would be prefixed 'SVG' except Path. Bad, Bad idea! var p = new SVGPathElement( string ); or var list = new SVGPathSegList( string ); var p = new SVGPathElement( list ); or construct individual segments (using constructors like ---> SVGPathSegCurveToQuadraticAbs() <---!!! ) -- Politicians should wear uniforms like Nascar drivers. Emblazoned with their corporate sponsors.
Received on Friday, 21 October 2011 18:36:07 UTC