- From: Rick <graham.rick@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 14:35:30 -0400
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Cc: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 21 October 2011 18:36:07 UTC
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote:
> As part of improving the SVG DOM, I think we should consider renaming
> SVGPathSegList to SVGPath (or perhaps even just Path). SVGPathSegList is
> unwieldy if we want to add a constructor to the interface so that authors
> can do
>
> var p = new SVGPath("M100,100 ...");
>
> Does anyone think there would be any compatibility risk with this?
>
>
Don't you mean SVGPathElement?
If you dropped the SVG prefix, all SVG objects would be prefixed 'SVG'
except Path. Bad, Bad idea!
var p = new SVGPathElement( string );
or
var list = new SVGPathSegList( string );
var p = new SVGPathElement( list );
or
construct individual segments (using constructors like --->
SVGPathSegCurveToQuadraticAbs() <---!!! )
--
Politicians should wear uniforms like Nascar drivers.
Emblazoned with their corporate sponsors.
Received on Friday, 21 October 2011 18:36:07 UTC