- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:07:11 -0800
- To: Chris Marrin <cmarrin@apple.com>
- Cc: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>, public-fx@w3.org
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Chris Marrin <cmarrin@apple.com> wrote: > On Nov 17, 2011, at 9:10 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote: > Last week I sent out some ideas to update the SVG composting > spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGCompositing/. > Some people suggested some improvements which I integrated. > Here is the updated list of proposals: > a. split up the spec in 2 sections: Porter-Duff & Blending. > Porter-Duff are compositing primitives that describes how 2 images (src+dst) > can be merged. > Porter-Duff will continue to use the existing comp-op property. > > Can I suggest that we refer to these as alpha compositing and color > compositing? I think it would make it more clear what we're talking about > (at least for me :-) And given that, I think the better names for the > properties are: 'alpha-compositing' and 'color-compositing'. I'm intrigued by this suggestion. +1 unless somebody has a good argument for why this is bad. ~TJ
Received on Friday, 18 November 2011 17:08:02 UTC