Re: Revisiting SVG Fonts from Charles Pritchard on 2011-11-03 (www-svg@w3.org from November 2011)

From: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 08:19:50 -0700
To: "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>
Cc: David Dailey <ddailey@zoominternet.net>, Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>, "www-svg@w3.org" <www-svg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <F74E6457-0AE6-4AF5-8CD9-19CCE00B0C83@jumis.com>

On Nov 3, 2011, at 1:05 AM, "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com> wrote:
> Would Mozilla be supportive of SVG Font development if other vendors were supportive of OpenType w/ SVG glyph tables?
> 
> I wouldn't. Mozilla as a whole doesn't really have positions on issues like this.

Would (functioning) patch sets supporting SVG Fonts be rejected from the Mozilla code base?

Received on Thursday, 3 November 2011 15:27:07 UTC