- From: Charles Lamont <charles@gateho.gotadsl.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 00:21:56 +0000
- To: www-svg@w3.org
Alex Danilo wrote: >>> I wanted to bring forward my strongest disagreement with Mozilla's stance >>> against SVG font support. >> From the 1.1.2 spec it is not clear to me (being dense) whether or not SVG >> fonts are meant to enable the production of multicoloured, or otherwise >> decorated fonts. >> It seems to me that this is precisely the kind of thing SVG is supposed >> to be for, and that no other potential mechanism exists. > Yes, the SVG 1.1 recommendation as it stands supports font > glyphs containing arbitrary SVG content, so multi-colour > etc. is all possible. > It is a definite yes. However, the level of support in different > browsers/SVG implementations varies. Mozilla and IE support > no part of any SVG font capability yet. So what are Mozilla and Microsoft's objections? -- Charles Lamont
Received on Tuesday, 1 November 2011 00:29:51 UTC