- From: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 11:49:22 -0700
- To: Dirk Schulze <vbs85@gmx.de>
- Cc: www-svg List <www-svg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 16 May 2011 18:49:49 UTC
As you can tell, the combination of transform, z-index and compositing is currently not well specified. SVG compositing has concepts like the canvas and enable-background while CSS has concepts like 3D and z-index. One of the stickiest points is 'enable-background: accumulate' where the background is pulled in during the compositing operation. As you and Robert O'Callahan point out, this will be hard when subsequent content will be at a lower z-index. Maybe we just need to get rid of this concept and introduce a new 'create-new-canvas' keyword. Also, every group with a comp-op would implicitly have this new keyword. On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Dirk Schulze <vbs85@gmx.de> wrote: > Hi www-svg, > > I have a short question about combining the new specifications 3D Transform > and Compositing (and maybe z-index as well). Isn't it possible that the > source graphic could be placed behind the destination graphic with 3D > Transforms? How would that influence the compositing of both graphics? > > Dirk >
Received on Monday, 16 May 2011 18:49:49 UTC