- From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 08:22:59 +0100
- To: Peter Junge <peter.junge@gmx.org>, SVG List <www-svg@w3.org>
Peter Junge wrote: > 2) The second alternative would mean going one step further by also > defining an internal SVG compatible namespace for UOML. OpenDocument > Format e.g. is also using a subset of SVG by defining it's own svg > namespace I would have thought that the way that would best match the original XML concept would be to define a profile of SVG, then use the actual SVG namespace. That allows an SVG aware tool to extract and render it without having to know anything about UOML. > -- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Thursday, 5 May 2011 07:23:26 UTC