Re: Typo on SVG11

• From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
• Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 11:32:36 +1200
• To: David Dailey <ddailey@zoominternet.net>
• Cc: www-svg@w3.org
• Message-ID: <20110722233236.GE19763@wok.mcc.id.au>

David Dailey:
> While you're at it, here's another:
> 
> A part of [1] reads:
> 
> When the text content of a graphic (e.g., in a
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/text.html#TextElement> 'text' element) explains
> its function, no text equivalent is required. Use the
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/struct.html#TitleElement> 'title' child element to
> explain the function <http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/text.html#TextElement>
> 'text' elements whose meaning is not clear from their text content.
> 
> Perhaps the word "of" between "function" and "text" might help.

Thanks David, I think an “of” is indeed warranted there.

Cameron

-- 
Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Received on Friday, 22 July 2011 23:33:06 UTC