- From: David Dailey <ddailey@zoominternet.net>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 08:18:33 -0400
- To: "'Cameron McCormack'" <cam@mcc.id.au>, "'Jeremie Patonnier'" <jeremie.patonnier@gmail.com>
- Cc: "'www-svg'" <www-svg@w3.org>
Hey Cameron! While you're at it, here's another: A part of [1] reads: When the text content of a graphic (e.g., in a <http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/text.html#TextElement> 'text' element) explains its function, no text equivalent is required. Use the <http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/struct.html#TitleElement> 'title' child element to explain the function <http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/text.html#TextElement> 'text' elements whose meaning is not clear from their text content. Perhaps the word "of" between "function" and "text" might help. Cheers David [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/access.html -----Original Message----- From: www-svg-request@w3.org [mailto:www-svg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Cameron McCormack Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 12:42 AM To: Jeremie Patonnier Cc: www-svg Subject: Re: Typo on SVG11 Hi Jeremie, Jeremie Patonnier: > There is a little typo mistake on section 17.4.2 of the SVG 11 spec. This > section is about SVGViewElement DOM interface but it mention a link to the > SVGAElement DOM interface. Thanks! I’ve fixed this in the CVS copy, now. Cameron -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Friday, 22 July 2011 12:19:03 UTC