- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:54:39 -0500
- To: Rick <graham.rick@gmail.com>
- CC: Paul Williams <pwilliams@infotrustgroup.com>, Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com>, "ddailey@zoominternet.net" <ddailey@zoominternet.net>, "www-svg@w3.org" <www-svg@w3.org>, "chris@w3.org" <chris@w3.org>, "yan.li@sru.edu" <yan.li@sru.edu>, "yanli@scnu.edu.cn" <yanli@scnu.edu.cn>, "david.dailey@sru.edu" <david.dailey@sru.edu>
Hi, folks- I see Chris answered the general questions about the Vector Effects module. Non-scaling stroke, specifically, is an important one on my list as well. I've added a reminder to our issue tracker (issue-2400) [1] for SVG 2, and we will try to move that forward as quickly as possible. [1] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2400 Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG, WebApps, and Web Events WGs Rick wrote (on 2/18/11 2:01 PM): > > > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Paul Williams > <pwilliams@infotrustgroup.com <mailto:pwilliams@infotrustgroup.com>> wrote: > > I vote with Jeff on this one, FWIW. Non-scaling strokes are one of > the key features needed for proper support of technical drawings in > SVG, and probably one of the most important. > > > My vote goes in there as well. > > I remember we toyed with the idea that a stroke width of zero would > always scale to one. I liked that idea, but this is better. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: www-svg-request@w3.org <mailto:www-svg-request@w3.org> > [mailto:www-svg-request@w3.org <mailto:www-svg-request@w3.org>] On > Behalf Of Jeff Schiller > Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 11:08 AM > To: ddailey@zoominternet.net <mailto:ddailey@zoominternet.net> > Cc: www-svg@w3.org <mailto:www-svg@w3.org>; chris@w3.org > <mailto:chris@w3.org>; yan.li <http://yan.li>@sru.edu > <http://sru.edu>; yanli@scnu.edu.cn <mailto:yanli@scnu.edu.cn>; > david.dailey@sru.edu <mailto:david.dailey@sru.edu> > Subject: Re: SVG 1.2 Vector Effects > > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:32 AM, <ddailey@zoominternet.net > <mailto:ddailey@zoominternet.net>> wrote: > > > > 2. What progress, if any, do we know of browsers or other user agents > > actually implementing Vector Effects? I know that Opera has > implemented some > > very important parts of 1.2. Is there any inventory of cross-browser > > progress on the various parts of 1.2? > > The only one that I know of is vector-effect="non-scaling-stroke" > which has been implemented by Opera and WebKit. I would like to see > it implemented in Gecko and IE9+ but priorities seem elsewhere... > > Jeff > > > > > > -- > Cheers! > Rick > "It's a summons." > "What's a summons?" > "It means summon's in trouble." > -- Rocky and Bullwinkle > --
Received on Friday, 18 February 2011 21:54:49 UTC