- From: Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:56:16 -0800
- To: Patrick Dengler <patd@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>, Tony Schreiner <tonyschr@microsoft.com>, Jonathan Watt <jwatt@jwatt.org>, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
*facepalm* I know there's a funny story in here somewhere... :) Jeff On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Patrick Dengler <patd@microsoft.com> wrote: > We went back and forth on that and in the end decided to align with Firefox > as it was important to follow the specification. This is also why we > added intrinsic sizing to the agenda for the face to face. > > > > http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/F2F/Auckland_2011/Agenda > > > > Patrick > > > > > > > > From: www-svg-request@w3.org [mailto:www-svg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of > Robert O'Callahan > Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 1:18 PM > To: Tony Schreiner > Cc: Jonathan Watt; www-svg > Subject: Re: SVG-as-an-image and scaling the SVG by default > > > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Tony Schreiner <tonyschr@microsoft.com> > wrote: > > For IE9 RC, just released today, we looked at the sizing behavior across > browsers and considered matching Opera's behavior of introducing a viewBox > for <img> only. But because this was not part of any specification and > because of the other sizing inconsistencies we decided to follow the letter > of the SVG spec. There may be a bit of irony here, as Firefox's choice to > follow the spec was one factor we considered in whether or not to follow > Opera's behavior. > > Sorry to hear that. We just changed a couple of days ago to follow the Opera > behavior. See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=614649 > > I strongly feel it's the right behavior for Web authors, since it makes SVG > behave much more like other image types. > > Rob > -- > "Now the Bereans were of more noble character than the Thessalonians, for > they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures > every day to see if what Paul said was true." [Acts 17:11]
Received on Friday, 11 February 2011 18:57:09 UTC