- From: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 11:21:07 +0100
- To: "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Cc: "Doug Schepers" <schepers@w3.org>, "www-svg@w3.org" <www-svg@w3.org>
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 12:03:15 +0200, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: ... > Rule 1 isn't enough. You need rule 2, or something like it, as well. > > Rob You're right. What I really meant was, why should raster images get this special treatment in svg at all? My guess is that this particular specialcase[1] is largely unused today. I'd therefore like to open up discussion on an alternative proposal, which is to simply drop the special handling for raster images with alpha in the pointer-event definition[2] in SVG 1.1 Second Edition. However, a thing to note is that filters aren't meant to affect pointer-events processing at all, for the purposes of hit detection it's as if there was no filter applied [2]. Anyway, thanks for bringing this up again, via http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/roc/archives/2011/02/distinguishing.html. Another question, does html:img have similar issues now that Firefox can apply filters to html content? Cheers /Erik [1] Case being: alpha=0 raster image in svg, used together with pointer-events=painted [2] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/publish/interact.html#PointerEventsProperty -- Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Wednesday, 2 February 2011 10:21:43 UTC