- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 17:09:05 +1200
- To: Vincent Hardy <vhardy@adobe.com>
- CC: Patrick Dengler <patd@microsoft.com>, Brian Birtles <birtles@gmail.com>, David Dailey <ddailey@zoominternet.net>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>, 'www-svg' <www-svg@w3.org>
On 4/08/11 3:06 AM, Vincent Hardy wrote: > I also thought we had resolved, during the FX meeting last week, to work > on requirements first. However, looking at the minutes log, I cannot > find any RESOLUTION or ACTION recorded on that. > > http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/fx/20110726 > > It seems that the log is truncated at midnight, and I do not see the > following part at: > > http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/fx/20110727 Looking at http://www.w3.org/2011/07/26-fx-irc, the conversation ended with Dean taking an action to write up use cases and a list of features to be added to CSS Animation. I suppose if we get agreement on that, then we can see what the difference in functionality between SVG and (extended) CSS Animations is, which will help us determine which of the three broad directions Brian outlined we should head towards.
Received on Thursday, 4 August 2011 05:10:04 UTC