RE: minutes, SVG WG Seattle F2F 2011 day 3 - SVG Color

No, the profile on the image is correct. I want the image to use rich black. That way any gradient in the image (the example image doesn't really have one, but imagine a picture that fades to black on the edges) is nice and continuous.
Therefore, if I put the image on a black background or want to put a black border on it, I want that black to be rich black as well.
If we're going to decide automatically that all solid filled black (and presumably gray) shapes and strokes will use preserve-black, this isn't going to happen.
That's why I think we need an extra switch for the preserve black option.
Lcms2 added this extra option (no-preservation, black only, black-plane) by duplicating its intents, but an optional switch seems cleaner to me. ( see DefaultIntents[])

Nick Hofstede
R&D Manager
From: Rik Cabanier []
Sent: maandag 1 augustus 2011 19:26
To: Nick Hofstede
Subject: Re: minutes, SVG WG Seattle F2F 2011 day 3 - SVG Color

Hi Nick,

I think this is a case where you want to ignore the profile that is attached to the image and swap it out with the destination profile instead.

There was a discussion at the f2f why we would need to swap out the attached profile. This seems to be a valid use-case for such a feature.

Rik Cabanier

On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Nick Hofstede <<>> wrote:
Quick note on the black preservation:

   ChrisL: last issue is preserving black.
   ... For example, in ICC if you specify cmyk(0,0,0,1),
   color-management systems tend to have a switch that specially treats
   that value.
   ... So even if the system does color-manipulation normally, that one
   color will instead stay solid, total black.
   ... This is so black text stays pure black and doesn't mix in other
   ... So, similarly, we need to see if we need it, and see if it's an
   input or output feature.

   cabanier: We have it in InDesign, and it's an output feature there.
   ... So we have some special cases there again; you don't want to
   preserve black on an image.

   ChrisL: So that's basically actually being an input feature.

   heycam: Does it make sense to have this controllable on images, or
   if we can magically just apply it to solid-color fills and strokes?
   ... Also, if you have some colored shapes which are composited
   together, and you happen to get black out of that, should that be

   TabAtkins_: So it sounds like we can just specify that solid-color
   strokes and fills automatically preserve black, and nothing else
   does. It can be applied on output, and doesn't need to be specified
   on input.

   cabanier: So we look at the operator on printing - if a shape is
   filled with an image or gradient, we don't preserve black. If it's
   filled with a color, we preserve.

   TabAtkins_: So if you composite a partially-transparent gradient
   over a black rectangle, you wouldn't preserve the black in it.

   heycam: So basically, for any image, track if the result color comes
   partially from a gradient or image. If so, don't preserve black;
   otherwise, preserve it.

   TabAtkins_: So it sounds like we can do this automatically at the
   end, and thus don't need a property for it.

   heycam: And in PDF, it's not controllable; it just happens

I'm not sure automatically deciding when to use black preservation is a good idea. I don't think you can always deduce it automatically and I think you should therefore be able to specify it.
Consider the use case talked about here for example:
If you would create this in SVG your underlying rectangle would become black-preserved black, and the black from the image would be rich black.
You're going to want to be able to trigger rich black on the solid-color fill.

With kind regards,

Nick Hofstede


Inventive Designers' Email Disclaimer:

This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner<>, and is
believed to be clean.


Inventive Designers' Email Disclaimer:

Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2011 07:14:52 UTC