- From: Vincent Hardy <vhardy@adobe.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 12:00:38 -0700
- To: Brian Birtles <birtles@gmail.com>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
- CC: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
Hi Brian, See comments below. Kind regards, Vincent From: Brian Birtles <birtles@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 22:39:49 -0700 To: "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org> Cc: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org> Subject: Dropping angle-bracket syntax for animation [...] 2) Consistency. No other major feature in SVG is available only with CSS. It seems unusual to have to switch syntax for animation only. >> Yes, I think that is a good point. [...] 5) XML toolchain. By providing an angle-bracket syntax, content can be more easily manipulated and generated by existing XML tools. For example, in my experience it is simpler to produce XML elements than plain text with XSLT. >> Yes, I agree that is the case.
Received on Monday, 1 August 2011 19:04:33 UTC