- From: Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:20:07 -0700
- To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Cc: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <AANLkTi=CTs1OOmevAhndGR-hYnyNFm4iqoX-c_4c=mJc@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote: > There's the SVG Integration spec: > http://dev.w3.org/SVG/modules/integration/SVGIntegration.html > > I've got a few actions to follow up on from the last SVG WG F2F, and as > soon as I update the draft, we will be pushing for a First Public Working > Draft on the spec. It should answer some of the questions I anticipate you > have. > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but that spec doesn't (yet?) cover sizing issues (though it does specify other important things like Referencing Modes. For sizing, it seems there are a lot of things to consider: - containing object's explicit/implicit size - <svg>'s size (fixed, percentage) - viewBox - preserveAspectRatio I think the behavior might be specified across the CSS, HTML, SVG 1.1 specs, but it's really not 100% clear to me. That's why I made that grid of 16 tests testing 3 dimensions (referencing element type, svg width/height, viewBox). Note that there are other dimensions to the test that I didn't bother with (ones where <img> and <object> don't have specified sizes, preserveAspectRatio=none). Maybe this is something that was covered clearly in the WICD/CDF specs? Thanks, Jeff
Received on Tuesday, 14 September 2010 18:20:55 UTC