- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 18:08:43 +1300
- To: Alex Danilo <alex@abbra.com>
- Cc: Shane Stephens <shans@google.com>, www-svg@w3.org
Alex Danilo: > Yes, and it's the CTM on the <g> that gets the supplemental transform, > so for the <g> getCTM() probably(?) doesn't need to change for the motion. > > I did say "rect" in the above quoted text, not <g>. Looks like I totally misread the OP’s original fragment; I thought the <animateMotion> was on the <rect>. > Once you get inside the <g> and look at the CTM being applied to > the <rect> it's taken the animateMotion into account, otherwise what > gets returned from getCTM isn't much use. OK, right. > Anyway, I'll stop there. Too many emails this week:-) :) -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Wednesday, 20 October 2010 05:09:22 UTC