- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 13:58:03 +1300
- To: Renata Hodovan <reni@inf.u-szeged.hu>
- Cc: Robert Longson <longsonr@gmail.com>, www-svg@w3.org
Hi Renata. Renata Hodovan: > But looking feConvolveMatrix or feMorphology I found the following: > > feConvolveMatrix: > > order = "<number-optional-number>" > kernelUnitLength = "<number-optional-number>" > > readonly attribute SVGAnimatedInteger orderX; > readonly attribute SVGAnimatedInteger orderY; > > readonly attribute SVGAnimatedNumber kernelUnitLengthX; > readonly attribute SVGAnimatedNumber kernelUnitLengthY; To me it looks like an inconsistency, but as Robert points out the lack of these convenience functions for setting both parts of the <number-optional-number> doesn’t result in a loss of functionality as you can set the individual components separately through the two separate IDL attributes. Is it worth adding them at this point? IMO probably not. (I think the convenience functions have marginal value.) -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Saturday, 16 October 2010 00:58:46 UTC