- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:22:11 +1300
- To: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
- Cc: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, Anthony Grasso <Anthony.Grasso@cisra.canon.com.au>, ddailey <ddailey@zoominternet.net>, "www-svg@w3.org" <www-svg@w3.org>, Alex Danilo <alex@abbra.com>
Daniel Holbert: > Note that http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/propidx.html explicitly singles out > <animateColor> (and not <animate>) for applicability here: > Name: ‘color-interpolation’ > [...] > Applies to: container elements, graphics elements and ‘animateColor’ > > IIUC, the "Applies to" list there is meant to be exhaustive. Since > <animate>'s not listed there, it would seem that the value of its > "color-interpolation" property should be ignored. Is that right? That would be my interpretation. An additional issue is that <animateColor> is not defined to be a stylable element. You can see in http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/attindex.html#PresentationAttributes which elements the presentation attributes may be specified on, and <animateColor> isn’t listed there. Similarly, in the table above in M.1, the style="" and class="" attributes aren’t allowed to be specified on <animateColor>. The SVGAnimateColorElement interface isn’t defined to inherit from SVGStylable. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Friday, 15 October 2010 23:22:58 UTC