- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:17:22 +0100
- To: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>, www-svg@w3.org
On Tuesday, October 12, 2010, 10:16:32 PM, Chris wrote: CL> On Tuesday, October 12, 2010, 1:54:09 AM, Daniel wrote: DH>> Hi www-svg, DH>> I'm writing to request a modification to the SVG 1.1 spec, to clear up DH>> an inconsistency. CL> Thanks, Daniel. CL> We are tracking this as ISSUE-2383. CL> Will mail once we have updated text in place for your review. Here is the updated wording, from the editor's draft. (Please ignore the attribute-less <a> elements in the markup - the href is added automatically when the spec is built). <p>When an <a>'image'</a> element references an SVG image the clip and overflow properties on the root element in the referenced SVG image are ignored (in the same manner as the x, y, width and height attributes are ignored). Unless the value of <a>'preserveAspectRatio'</a> on the <a>'image'</a> element starts with 'defer', the <a>'preserveAspectRatio'</a> attribute on the root element in the referenced SVG image is also ignored (see <a>'preserveAspectRatio'</a> for details). Instead, the <a>'preserveAspectRatio'</a> attribute on the referencing <a>'image'</a> element defines how the SVG image content is fitted into the viewport and the clip and overflow properties on the <a>'image'</a> element define how the SVG image content is clipped (or not) relative to the viewport.</p> Please let us know whether this revised wording is satisfactory. -- Chris Lilley Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups
Received on Monday, 29 November 2010 15:17:39 UTC