On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 19:48:03 +0100, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > On 11/23/10 12:58 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> So that you do not need namespace knowledge. > > Namespace knowledge where? As an implementor? Or as an author? Either? > The whole point if a universal .classList and .className is to make > authors not have to deal with namespace knowledge, imo. And it doesn't > require mapping to a specific attr name for that. So if I set Element.className on an element that is not in a namespace and has no attributes. Its attributes collection remains empty or something? -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/Received on Tuesday, 23 November 2010 19:03:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:54:29 UTC