- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:40:29 +1300
- To: "Dr. Olaf Hoffmann" <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
Cameron McCormack: > > I agree, for consistency with the other discrete animations we should > > have from="nonzero" to="evenodd" on the fill-rule animations. Changed now: http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/animate-elem-41-t.svg Dr. Olaf Hoffmann: > Do you have in mind, if there is a test/subtest for implicte and > explicite discrete to-animations in the W3C-test-suite? > Maybe there is no currently - but it would be very useful to > test the correct timing. By my calculations[1], the only one is: filters-image-02-b.svg: <animate attributeName="xlink:href" to="../images/pinksquidj.png" dur="2s" fill="freeze"/> so yes it would be good to have some tests for discrete to-animations, both implicit and explicit. > According to my test-suite usual viewers like KSVG1, WebKit, > Adobe plugin, Squiggle and Opera have the wrong timing or > other problems with discrete to-animations (of course most > have problems with to-animations in general, but discrete > to-animation is a much simpler issue ;o) I need to be reminded: is it the case that SMIL Animation (and hence SVG 1.1) does not specify the timing of implicit discrete animations (and that perhaps SMIL 3 does)? [1] http://pastebin.mozilla.org/862622 -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Tuesday, 23 November 2010 01:41:14 UTC