On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 23:33:14 -0500 Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU> wrote: > On 11/8/10 11:31 PM, G. Wade Johnson wrote: > >> No, that's the general behavior for situations in which scripting > >> is disabled: the script does not run but _is_ marked as having > >> executed so cloning it and inserting it elsewhere won't run it. > >> You can test this with, say, XMLHttpRequest where the responseXML > >> includes <script> elements. > > > > Okay. That makes sense. But, it still brings me back to my real > > questions. Is this behavior guaranteed by the specs, or is it an > > implementation artifact? > > It started as the latter and is moving towards the former, now that > we actually _have_ specs that are trying to cover that ground (e.g. > HTML5). Thanks, Boris. That's what I was trying to understand. I look forward to the clarification of the specs. G. Wade -- I never let schooling get in the way of my education. -- Mark TwainReceived on Tuesday, 9 November 2010 13:02:49 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:54:29 UTC