- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 10:44:20 -0500
- To: "G. Wade Johnson" <gwadej@anomaly.org>
- CC: www-svg@w3.org
On 11/8/10 8:06 AM, G. Wade Johnson wrote: >> It's consistent with them being cloned and then inserted, no? > > The code does not run at all in the referenced document, so I would > think this would be different. No, that's the general behavior for situations in which scripting is disabled: the script does not run but _is_ marked as having executed so cloning it and inserting it elsewhere won't run it. You can test this with, say, XMLHttpRequest where the responseXML includes <script> elements. > Actually, I'm looking to understand what SVG is intended to support at > the moment. I'm really okay with either outcome, but there's seems to > be a genuine fuzzy spot here in the spec. Yeah, I agree the processing model is somewhat underdefined. -Boris
Received on Monday, 8 November 2010 15:44:53 UTC