- From: Dr. Olaf Hoffmann <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
- Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 14:27:29 +0200
- To: www-svg@w3.org
- Message-Id: <201005231427.29959.Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
Hello www-svg, if a path itself has a directionality at the corners/vertices, but the average is zero, what is the correct behaviour? See attachment for examples. I found a definition, if the path has no directionality, but not about the problem, that the average direction can be a zero vector (the tangent vectors have an opposite direction). Even worse, current viewers display it typically different from each other. I'm not sure, what a useful behaviour could be, therefore maybe the usual local x-axis should apply. For the next SVG version it might be useful as well to have an additional property to suppress markers for vertices with no directionality or with an average resulting in a zero vector. Results with the usual suspects Opera, Batik/Squiggle, adobe-plugin, Gecko, WebKit, Konqueror+KSVG look like random choice, result in Inkscape (0.46) is completely nonsense. Well, even for cases with a defined direction, the results are often quite different for non-trivial samples. I think, currently the adobe plugin provides results almost as specified in the recommendation. the Geckos quite often provide a correct result. Others are more often wrong, therefore results from these viewers are anyway no reliable source for a direction of a path as specified ;o) Olaf
Attachments
- image/svg+xml attachment: directionality01.svg
Received on Sunday, 23 May 2010 12:31:38 UTC