Re: Questions about events

On 25 March 2010 09:44, Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com> wrote:
>
> Did you mean:
> "jwatt's suggestion was that onabort and onerror be _abort and error_
> events rather having _SVGAbort and SVGError_ events IIRC."?
>

Erik,

That's exactly what we meant.

Robert

Received on Thursday, 25 March 2010 09:57:44 UTC