- From: Alex Danilo <alex@abbra.com>
- Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:11:36 +1000
- To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Cc: robert@ocallahan.org, Patrick Dengler <patd@microsoft.com>, www-svg@w3.org, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Hi All, --Doug explains--: >Hi, Robert- > >Robert O'Callahan wrote (on 6/2/10 11:46 PM): >> <AlexD> Are there any tests for HTMl5 parsing conformance? >> >> pdengler: MSIE 9 hsa no plans for this, its for later. first we need >> to rationalise and unionise many things >> ... i could throw out some idea on default inlining SVG... putting >> an XY coordinateon a div in svg, that wont hold unless you ge tthe >> other stuff sorted >> ... we have to nail the union of the 2 specs >> >> >> Does this mean that Microsoft isn't committed to following the HTML5 >> spec for parsing SVG in HTML? > >Please recall that since he wasn't there, Alex was typing stuff into IRC >that was not in sync with the verbal conversation, but rather were >responses to what had been scribed. So, your quoted passage is a >non-sequential non-sequitur. Yes indeed. Apologies to all for breaking the temporal flow which has confused reading of the minutes. To properly read them, please take note that any lines beginning with <name> are typed in by individuals, not the scribe. Best if you just ignore anything starting with <AlexD> to be safe. I'll just head off now to bash some rocks together. Bye, Alex >A more accurate reading of the minutes would be: >[[ >shepazu: MSIE considered novel syntax... >... >pdengler: MSIE 9 hsa no plans for this, its for later. first we need to >rationalise and unionise many things >]] > >In other words, as I understand it, the IE team does not plan to pursue >parsing beyond that defined in the HTML5 spec, for IE9, and that any >such differences would happen through coordination between the SVG and >HTML WGs. > >Regards- >-Doug Schepers >W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs > > >
Received on Friday, 4 June 2010 00:12:42 UTC