- From: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 21:57:09 +0200
- To: "Jeff Schiller" <codedread@gmail.com>, "Patrick Dengler" <patd@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "www-svg@w3.org" <www-svg@w3.org>
I think it would make sense if the width and height passed into the drawImage call were used as the svg viewport, and if they are not specified then yes, making the svg viewport equal to the canvas width/height sounds reasonable to me. Any clarifications should go into the html5/canvas spec though. Cheers /Erik On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 19:58:33 +0200, Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com> wrote: > Awesome! Can't wait to have drawImage(mySvgImage) in <canvas> :) > > Opens the door to automating SVG test cases too - use canvas pixel > operations to check the rendered results of a SVG file. Of course that > requires all browsers to support this :/ > > Intuitively, I guess I would have thought it was percentage of the > <canvas> > element's dimensions. > > Whatever the decision might be, it looks like an update to > http://dev.w3.org/html5/canvas-api/canvas-2d-api.html#images will be > required. > > Jeff > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 6:51 AM, Patrick Dengler <patd@microsoft.com> > wrote: > >> From the canvas spec, drawImage states that drawImage should draw based >> on the intrinsic dimensions of an image. >> >> >> >> We need clarification on what to do if the intrinsic dimensions of the >> source are percentage based. >> >> >> >> Webkit establishes the size the based on window size when you loaded it. >> When you resize the window, you get different results on the Canvas. >> >> >> >> Thoughts/Clarifications are welcomed. >> -- Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Tuesday, 20 July 2010 19:57:48 UTC