- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 22:38:37 +0100
- To: public-svg-wg@w3.org
- CC: www-svg@w3.org
Hello,
Minutes of the 7 Jan 2010 SVG WG meeting are at
http://www.w3.org/2010/01/07-svg-minutes.html
and below as text for bots
SVG Working Group Teleconference
07 Jan 2010
[2]Agenda
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2010JanMar/0001.html
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2010/01/07-svg-irc
Attendees
Present
ed, ChrisL, Shepazu, anthony
Regrets
Patrick, JWatt
Chair
Erik
Scribe
anthony, chris
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]action items for 1.1SE
2. [6]element and attribute tables
3. [7]svg charter update
4. [8]Review of ACTION-2597, Case sensitivity errata
5. [9]f2f location and date
* [10]Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________
<trackbot> Date: 07 January 2010
<ed> trackbot, start telcon
<trackbot> Meeting: SVG Working Group Teleconference
<trackbot> Date: 07 January 2010
[11]http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/errata/implementation-repor
t.html
[11] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/errata/implementation-report.html
[12]http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/products/1
[12] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/products/1
was working on ACTION-2697
<scribe> scribenick: chrisl
action items for 1.1SE
ACTION-2358
ACTION-2358?
<trackbot> ACTION-2358 -- Jonathan Watt to propose wording for the
clip path pointer-events erratum and masking/compositing module
change -- due 2008-12-04 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> [13]http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2358
[13] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2358
ACTION-2372?
<trackbot> ACTION-2372 -- Doug Schepers to propose revised wording
for the errata item "Capturing pointer-events with a zero opacity
mask" to clarify it with clip-path -- due 2008-12-11 --
PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> [14]http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2372
[14] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2372
Whos is waiting on what there?
DS: Did we decide to make it undefined
leave to next telcon so JWatt can comment
DS: Sent a draft proposal for the joint CSS SVG taskforce
ACTION-2695?
<trackbot> ACTION-2695 -- Erik Dahlström to investigate
getIntersectionList and add clarification to the specification --
due 2009-11-26 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [15]http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2695
[15] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2695
ED: Reviewed one test by Cameron,
<ed> struct-dom-11-f.svg
<ed>
[16]http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/struct-dom-11-f.sv
g
[16] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/struct-dom-11-f.svg
Opera now passes
ED: Difference of nterpretation on what coordinate system applies
... if there is a veiwbox and a container that does not match that
aspect ratio
CL: Is the spec unclear?
ED: Cam and i interpreted it differently
"initial coordinate system"
<ed>
[17]http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/coords.html#InitialCoordinateSystem
[17] http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/coords.html#InitialCoordinateSystem
<ed>
[18]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2009OctDec/006
2.html
[18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2009OctDec/0062.html
ed: edited spec to reword, Cam didn't disagree
cl: does that change affect implementations
ed: not really. mainly an explicit cross link in the spec
cl: seems ok to me
ACTION-2685?
<trackbot> ACTION-2685 -- Erik Dahlström to work on java bindings
scripts -- due 2009-10-28 -- CLOSED
<trackbot> [19]http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2685
[19] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2685
ed: have to manually copy *changes* to svg.idl from master to
publish, these are *not the same* and the publish script does not
update the one in publish
<ed>
[20]http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/coords-dom-03-f.sv
g
[20] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/coords-dom-03-f.svg
its in ok. should be marked as accepted
action ERIK make coords-dom-03-f and struct-dom-11-f accepted
<trackbot> Created ACTION-2708 - Make coords-dom-03-f and
struct-dom-11-f accepted [on Erik Dahlström - due 2010-01-14].
ed: progress on single page PDF. is it manual or automatic
ag: I used safari to make it
ds: cameron made it in the build scriopt for tiny 1.2
cl: maybe uses apache fop?
... we need to make patch files for the tests that batik doesn't
pass so we have reference images
... useful to cvs tage the version of errata tests used to exit cr
list of relevant tests is
[21]http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/errata/implementation-repor
t.html
[21] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/errata/implementation-report.html
ACTION-2477?
<trackbot> ACTION-2477 -- Doug Schepers to propose a solution for
ISSUE-2071, referring to external resources and how that affects
security (\"tainting\" an svg) and how that might apply to methods
like elementFromPoint -- due 2009-02-26 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [22]http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2477
[22] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2477
ds: didn't we talk about that in December, there is a way around it
... will get to it this week
ACTION-2676?
<trackbot> ACTION-2676 -- Chris Lilley to fix the 1.1 second edition
wording for values that are accessed where no attribute was
provided,
[23]http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/publish/svgdom.html#SVGDOMO
verview and have it be NaN or 0 with unknown unit depending on the
type of domobject -- due 2009-10-06 -- OPEN
[23] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/publish/svgdom.html#SVGDOMOverview
<trackbot> [24]http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2676
[24] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2676
re-assigned to Erik
element and attribute tables
ag: extracting from xml, putting in hash table
ds: please document it so we can keep using it
... in future we might extract this from rng which would make it
easier
... can it be written so extraction part and composing/spec making
part are semi independent?
ag: yeah
... by swapping in a different xslt
... its a one-shot thing
ds: applies to other specs too, handy tool to have
cl: have a look at tiny1.2 rng if you want
ag: will work on this over the next week
ds: would like integration to be a rec so html can reference it
svg charter update
ed: whats the timeline here?
ds: chartered till march, want to have it ready so ac review before
charter ends
... ensure jwat and patrick are there for that one
cl: task force charter does not have ac review
<ed>
[25]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2010JanMar/000
5.html
[25] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2010JanMar/0005.html
ds: but needs to be a subset of the deliverables
cl: yes
ed: transitions should be an area of coordinations
<anthony> scribe: anthony
ed: you have advanced text layout here what did you mean by it?
ds: the two bullet points underneath
... they are sub bullet points
ag: might want to turn them into dashes
... to make it more clear they are sub bullet points
ed: i guess the task force would go on for sometime?
... that way Cameron can participate and work on layout
ds: Cameron gave me feedback on this
... I expect him to be back while taskforce is operating
... I can make the suggested changes
... and a draft charter for next Tuesday
<scribe> ACTION: Doug to Create a draft charter [recorded in
[26]http://www.w3.org/2010/01/07-svg-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-2709 - Create a draft charter [on Doug
Schepers - due 2010-01-14].
<ed>
[27]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2009OctDec/006
8.html
[27] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2009OctDec/0068.html
Review of ACTION-2597, Case sensitivity errata
ACTION-2597?
<trackbot> Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel
<ChrisL> ag: wording different because case sensitivity for rgb was
different
<ChrisL> ... tiny errata new section above html color keywords
<ChrisL> ed: maybe possible to miss, a link would help
<ChrisL> .. from definition of integer and float func notation to
that section
<ChrisL> ... make it clear its different from 1.1
<ChrisL> ... make it easier to spot they are case insensitive
<ChrisL> ag: add links in the first couple of words in that section.
will do that
f2f location and date
<ChrisL> I have permission to go to LGB2010 in Brussels, if that
affects anything
<ed>
[28]http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/Meetings#F2F_Meeting_Info
rmation
[28] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/Meetings#F2F_Meeting_Information
<ChrisL> ag: can come to that too
<ChrisL> ds: dom api summic. ecma tc39 is meeting in CA March
<shepazu> ECMA TC39 meeting on March 24-25 at Yahoo
<ChrisL> so a couplde of days after tc39 would be good
<ChrisL> Jon F would be good there
<ChrisL> ds; so fri-sat 26 and 27 for a dom summit?
<ChrisL> ag: priority is the svg f2f
<ChrisL> ed: depends who from opera is going to tc39
<ChrisL> ... probably ok
<ChrisL> ... nice to have some more details to present but couldd do
that before the meeting
<ChrisL> ... interesting to go
<ChrisL> lgm is 26-29 May
<ChrisL> [29]http://www.libregraphicsmeeting.org/2010/
[29] http://www.libregraphicsmeeting.org/2010/
<ChrisL> ds: also, remember the mini tp idea?
<ChrisL> ds: maybe minitp 3-5 april
<ChrisL> ... dom summit 1-2 april
<ChrisL> adjourned
<ChrisL> scribe: chris
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: Doug to Create a draft charter [recorded in
[30]http://www.w3.org/2010/01/07-svg-minutes.html#action01]
[End of minutes]
___________________________________
--
Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org
Technical Director, Interaction Domain
W3C Graphics Activity Lead
Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Thursday, 7 January 2010 21:39:43 UTC