W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > February 2010

Re: SVG tiny

From: Ralph Giles <giles@ghostscript.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:28:02 -0800
Message-ID: <5d88ef651002240828oc5319b0p45da8ef264140f6b@mail.gmail.com>
To: ROUTE 66 - Lia Arnaut <carnaut@66.com>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:13 AM, ROUTE 66 - Lia Arnaut <carnaut@66.com> wrote:

> Until now I had to provide icons in the SVG 1.1 format (<!DOCTYPE svg PUBLIC
> "-//W3C//DTD SVG 1.1//EN") that allowed me to preserve the opacity of the
> elements. Now I have to provide icons in the SVG 1.2 tiny format or SVG 1.1
> tiny (<!DOCTYPE svg PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD SVG 1.1 Tiny//EN") but the
> transparent artwork is rasterized.

SVG Tiny does support transparency, using the stroke-opacity,
fill-opacity and stop-opacity attributes, so this sounds like a tool
limitation. I don't have any specific suggestions for an alternate.
What are you using now, and what's the source format?

Received on Wednesday, 24 February 2010 18:11:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:54:25 UTC