- From: Julien Reichel <Julien.Reichel@spinetix.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 13:18:13 +0100
- To: <www-svg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <364D31930BDB974AB40E22C5C2E584ED5518A3@asterix.SPINETIX.local>
Dear all,
In the 3 test of SVG Tiny 1.2 animate-elem-20-t, animate-elem-21-t and
animate-elem-29-t [1], it is said:
"With the second click on "fade in", however, the behavior might be
different. [...] After the second click on "fade in", however, the red square
goes from zero to 100% opacity, and then goes back from 100% to zero opacity.
This is because of the hyperlinking rules as they relate to resolved start
times in the SMIL 2.1 specification."
is this behavior normative ? or is it only one of the possible behaviors and
the might still pass if the fade (in/out) only respond to mouse clicks.
If this is a normative behavior, can somebody point out the part of the SMIL
specification describing this behavior ?
If this behavior is normative can somebody clarify the behavior in the
following case:
- 0s: Click on "fade in" -> Fade in starts
- 3s: Click on "fade out" -> Fade out start
- 7s: Click on "fade in" -> Fade in start
- 10s: No actions -> Fade out (might) start (as described in the
test case)
- 14s: Click on "fade in" -> Fade in starts
- 15s: Click on "fade out" -> fade out starts (I would expect it)
- 20s: Click on "fade in" -> Fade in starts
-> When will the fade out start ? 1s latter ? 3s latter ?
Opera is starting the fade out 3s later, but I must admit I cannot see any
explanation for that.
Regards
Julien
[1] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/animate-elem-20-t.svg
http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/animate-elem-21-t.svg
http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/animate-elem-29-t.svg
Julien Reichel, PhD
Technology Architect
___________________________
SpinetiX SA
Rue des Terreaux 17
1003 Lausanne, Switzerland
T +41 21 341 15 50
F +41 21 311 19 56
julien.reichel@spinetix.com
http://www.spinetix.com
___________________________
Received on Monday, 8 February 2010 12:18:42 UTC