- From: Julien Reichel <Julien.Reichel@spinetix.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 13:18:13 +0100
- To: <www-svg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <364D31930BDB974AB40E22C5C2E584ED5518A3@asterix.SPINETIX.local>
Dear all, In the 3 test of SVG Tiny 1.2 animate-elem-20-t, animate-elem-21-t and animate-elem-29-t [1], it is said: "With the second click on "fade in", however, the behavior might be different. [...] After the second click on "fade in", however, the red square goes from zero to 100% opacity, and then goes back from 100% to zero opacity. This is because of the hyperlinking rules as they relate to resolved start times in the SMIL 2.1 specification." is this behavior normative ? or is it only one of the possible behaviors and the might still pass if the fade (in/out) only respond to mouse clicks. If this is a normative behavior, can somebody point out the part of the SMIL specification describing this behavior ? If this behavior is normative can somebody clarify the behavior in the following case: - 0s: Click on "fade in" -> Fade in starts - 3s: Click on "fade out" -> Fade out start - 7s: Click on "fade in" -> Fade in start - 10s: No actions -> Fade out (might) start (as described in the test case) - 14s: Click on "fade in" -> Fade in starts - 15s: Click on "fade out" -> fade out starts (I would expect it) - 20s: Click on "fade in" -> Fade in starts -> When will the fade out start ? 1s latter ? 3s latter ? Opera is starting the fade out 3s later, but I must admit I cannot see any explanation for that. Regards Julien [1] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/animate-elem-20-t.svg http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/animate-elem-21-t.svg http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/animate-elem-29-t.svg Julien Reichel, PhD Technology Architect ___________________________ SpinetiX SA Rue des Terreaux 17 1003 Lausanne, Switzerland T +41 21 341 15 50 F +41 21 311 19 56 julien.reichel@spinetix.com http://www.spinetix.com ___________________________
Received on Monday, 8 February 2010 12:18:42 UTC