- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:44:14 +0100
- To: Jonathan Watt <jwatt@jwatt.org>
- CC: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
On Friday, October 30, 2009, 5:23:38 PM, Jonathan wrote: JW> http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/animate.html#AttributeTypeAttribute JW> For the attribute "attributeType" the spec says this about the value "CSS": JW> "CSS" JW> This specifies that the value of "attributeName" is the name JW> of a CSS property defined as animatable in this specification. JW> If the author has explicitly specified "CSS" then clearly they want to target JW> CSS, and limiting the permitted properties unnecessarily limits the capabilities JW> of SMIL animation [compared to CSS animation]. It would seem better not to JW> impose an artificial limit, and to enable parity between SMIL animation and CSS JW> animation. JW> Mozilla would like to propose striking the words "defined as animatable in this JW> specification". How about 'defined as animatable'? The mai value of the CSS and XML options is to resolve ambiguity for occasional name clashes. Mostly, the default value works fine. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Friday, 30 October 2009 20:38:30 UTC