- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:29:33 +0200
- To: robert@ocallahan.org, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:17:44 +0200, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: > They've worked around it by making 'filter' undetectable with magic JS > hacks similar to what multiple browsers do with "document.all". But a > much simpler solution is to name the CSSStyleDeclaration member instead, > say 'svgFilter'. > How do people feel about that? I'm not sure if any spec needs to be > changed since apparently the names of the CSSStyleDeclaration SVG > members aren't > actually in any spec... cssFilter would be better for consistency with cssFloat, I think; also since properties are not restricted to particular languages. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Sunday, 18 October 2009 21:30:09 UTC