W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > November 2009

Re: More Ideas around DOM Constructors

From: Steve Withall <steve@withallyourequire.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 10:05:57 +1100
Message-Id: <200911272306.nARN6Amh001495@mail15.tpg.com.au>
To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
Cc: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>, Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com>
At 27/11/2009 06:28 PM, Doug Schepers wrote:
>Hi, -
>>Or perhaps the reliance on the XLink namespace is going away ?
>I would like to move away from the use of the XLink NS, since the 
>promise of the XLink spec never really materialized.  There are 
>complications, but I think we can do it.


Is that why you don't use the standard xlink:href attribute in your 
Parameters specification?  :)

XLink may not have lived up to expectations, but at least it's 
familiar and everyone knows where they stand with it. I suggest 
continuing to use it where appropriate unless there's a good reason not to.


>I don't think the idea of namespaced attributes is going to go away, 
>so a good generic API will have to handle them.
>[1] http://schepers.cc/w3c/svg/api/cog.svg
>-Doug Schepers
>W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs
Received on Friday, 27 November 2009 23:06:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:54:24 UTC