- From: Jonathan Watt <jwatt@jwatt.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:51:51 +0200
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, www-svg@w3.org, felipe.sanches@gmail.com
On 6/22/09 10:24 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:03:04 +0200, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: >> Recently a grammar has been added to the SVG Color module: >> >> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/modules/color/master/SVGColor.html#syntax >> >> So the <name> part is: >> >> name ::= [^,()#x20#x9#xD#xA] >> >> That grammar (at least the non-device colour parts of it) will be ported >> back to SVG 1.1 Second Edition, which is set to be published some time >> within the next few months. > > Wouldn't it be better for it to match IDENT or some such from CSS so it can later be safely ported to CSS without complicated conversion algorithms? I'm concerned about this too. I feel it would be safer to start restricted and relax things later, rather than start ultra relaxed and then find we need to restrict things for whatever reason and risk breaking content.
Received on Monday, 22 June 2009 10:52:27 UTC