- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 12:44:26 +1100
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org, www-svg@w3.org
Boris Zbarsky: > Sort of. It's a bit weird, because it actually does change the > specified and computed value as it animates. Last I checked, the > fit between the model as sort-of described in SMIL and the way > CSS actually works was pretty poor. It was causing us some major > implementation headaches. IIRC in Batik I implemented getting of underlying CSS values by removing the animated property from the override style sheet, getting the computed value, then re-adding the property to the override style sheet. So I’d agree, the model’s not perfect. I wonder if other implementations ignore that and just do something special in the cascade instead of messing with the override style? -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Saturday, 28 February 2009 01:45:05 UTC