- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 05:03:15 -0400
- To: ~:'' ありがとうございました <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
- CC: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>, whatwg@whatwg.org
Hi, Jonathan- "~:'' ありがとうございました" wrote (on 8/14/09 4:26 AM): > A plan to enable Forms? > > Does the SVG WG have a plan to enable Forms? The SVG WG has never intended to include native form functionality, including form widgets, into SVG, and that has not changed. Instead, the policy has always been that form functionality would be provided by a dedicated forms language such as XForms, or by a hybrid language like X/HTML. We are getting to the point where mixing SVG and X/HTML is possible in most browsers, so using that approach is probably the most pragmatic choice. > what is the current status regarding sockets and SVG 1.2? We have dropped the sockets interface from SVG 1.2, and future work on the topic will be covered by the WebApps WG's Web Sockets specification: http://www.w3.org/TR/websockets/ You might also be interested in the XHR spec, from the same group: http://www.w3.org/TR/XMLHttpRequest/ Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs
Received on Friday, 14 August 2009 09:03:26 UTC