- From: Julien Reichel <Julien.Reichel@spinetix.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:53:47 +0200
- To: <anthony.grasso@cisra.canon.com.au>
- Cc: <www-svg@w3.org>
Dear Anthony, The response is satisfactory Julien -----Original Message----- From: www-svg-request@w3.org [mailto:www-svg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Anthony Grasso Sent: vendredi 17 octobre 2008 13:42 To: Julien Reichel Cc: www-svg@w3.org Subject: Re: [1.2T-LC] Clarification for removal of script element (ISSUE-2098) Hi Julien, The SVG Working Group discussed the question you raised. Please see the comments below. Julien Reichel wrote: > Hi, > > > > Basic question about script: > > Can a script element remove itself from the XML tree ? If yes what is > the impact on the execution of the script > > > > Example: > > <script xml:id='test'> > > var scr = document.getElementById("test"); > > scr.parentNode.removeChild(scr); > > // more script > > ... > > </script> > > Does this throw an exception ? > > Does the "more script" get executed or not ? > In summary no. The Working Group decided to add wording to the scripting chapter [1] of the specification to clarify this. The new wording is the second paragraph after the script element processing steps. This change will appear in the next publication of the specification Please let us know at your earliest convenience if the change and response is satisfactory. Kind Regards, Anthony Grasso. [1] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/master/script.html#ScriptElement
Received on Monday, 20 October 2008 07:54:32 UTC